Legal Opinion

State v. Bland

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 6, 1913No. 18,820; No. 18,871; No. 18,755PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Nos. 18,820 and 18,871. Appeals from Cherokee district court; Edward E. Sapp, judge. No. 18,755. Original proceeding in mandamus. Opinion filed December 6, 1913.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

R. J. Bland, Charles Dixon and Harry Brown were prosecuted for violations of the prohibitory liquor law. In the information ■ each was charged in eleven counts with illegal sales of intoxicating liquors, and in the twelfth count each was charged with maintaining a common nuisance. Upon arraignment the defendants refused to plead, and thereupon a plea of not guilty was entered by the court as to each. The refusal to plead was based on the claim that the information was without validity because it was not entitled as the district court of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. WaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  2. State v. WallerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  3. State v. BaxterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
  4. In re EllisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  5. State v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Galindo v. City of CoffeyvilleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  2. State v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  3. Anderson v. Pension & Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
  4. State v. GlazeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  5. State v. Marshall & Brown-Sidorowicz, P.A.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1978

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API