Legal Opinion
Glenn Rose v. Fred R. Dickson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 27, 1964No. 18670_1PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BROWNING, Circuit Judge.
Appellant pleaded guilty in the Superior Court of Alameda County, California, to charges of kidnaping and aggravated assault, and was sentenced to imprisonment. In due course he filed a petition for habeas corpus in the court below, alleging violations of his Fourteenth Amendment rights. The petition was denied. Only two of the many grounds for relief pressed upon the District Court have been urged on this appeal.
First. Appellant asserts that he did not have effective assistance of counsel. This contention is based upon the affidavit of the attorney who represented…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Darr v. BurfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Smith v. O'GRADYSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Wade v. MayoSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Charles Earl Brubaker v. Fred R. Dickson, Warden of the California State Prison at San Quentin, CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Wilder v. CockrellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Wallace Leroy Schiers v. The People of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- In Re RoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Homer K. Morehead v. State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.