Legal Opinion
Wilder v. Cockrell
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided November 26, 2001No. 01-40296PublishedCited by 111 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RHESA HAWKINS BARKSDALE, Circuit Judge:
The district court having granted conditional habeas relief to Donald Wilder, at issue is whether his several evidentiary and ineffective assistance of counsel claims, made in varying forms during direct appeal and state habeas proceedings, can, for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(1), exhaust a federal due process claim based on Chambers v. Mississippi, 410 U.S. 284, 93 S.Ct. 1038, 35 L.Ed.2d 297 (1973) (holding due process precludes mechanistic application of hearsay rule to prevent criminal defendant’s introduction of exculpatory third-party…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by111 opinions
- Anderson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- Henry v. CockrellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- Kenneth Wayne Morris v. Doug Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- Bagwell v. DretkeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- Kittelson v. DretkeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.