Legal Opinion

Klein & Heffelman Co. v. Peterman

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 14, 1916PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error: Court of Appeals for Wayne county.

1Opinion of the CourtHouck, J.

This is a proceeding in error in which it is sought to reverse the judgment of the common pleas court of Wayne county.

*146The plaintiff in error was the plaintiff below and the defendants in error, Martha and T. J. Peter-man, were the defendants below.

The basis of the suit below was to recover the sum of $200, as evidenced by three promissory notes, which were executed by the defendants and delivered by them to plaintiff in part paymeht of the purchase price of a piano, the sum of $25 being paid in cash.

The notes were secured by chattel mortgage on the piano purchased.

The petition contained a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Feazel v. FeazelOhio Court of Appeals · 1915

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Botzum Bros. Co. v. Brown Lumber Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1957
  2. Forester v. ScottOhio Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. James Conforti Construction Co v. Neek Realty Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1925
  4. Ramos v. Genesis Healthcare, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API