Legal Opinion

Feazel v. Feazel

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 9, 1915PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error: Court of Appeals for Licking county.

1Opinion of the CourtHouck, J.

This is a proceeding in error prosecuted from the common pleas court of Licking county, Ohio, the parties standing here in the same position as in the court below.

The cause was submitted to the common pleas court upon the question made by the pleadings in the case as to whether or not the plaintiff, Perry Feazel, is estopped, and whether the claim in the petition is res adjudicata by reason of the allegations and matter set forth in the answer of the defendant, Jacob Feazel, said cause being submitted to the common pleas court upon the following stipulation and agreement between the parties…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Charles R. Strunk v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Klein & Heffelman Co. v. PetermanOhio Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. United States v. AnticoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API