Legal Opinion

Ganzen Unemployment Compensation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 13, 1956No. Appeal, No. 135PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Wright, J.,

Iwan Ganzen, claimant in this unemployment compensation case, was employed on a trial basis by the Adelphia Equipment Company. According to Ms signed statement, claimant was informed that he would receive $1.25 per hour, and that the employer “would observe my work and see if he could give me a raise”. After working two days, claimant quit the job because the employer refused to increase the hourly wage rate, whereas claimant would not continue work for less than $1.50 per hour. The Bureau, Referee, and Board of Review denied benefits. This appeal by claimant followed.

It…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Goldstein Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. McGuire v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Buletza Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. Drolles Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hambridge Steel Erectors, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  2. Barittisky Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Morris Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Eckley Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. Patelmo Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API