Legal Opinion

Patelmo Unemployment Compensation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 13, 1961No. Appeal, No. 31PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Montgomery, J.,

This is an appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review denying benefits to claimant for the reason that he voluntarily terminated his employment without cause of a necessitous and compelling nature.

*58Claimant was last employed as a syrup mixer by Day’s Beverages, Philadelphia. His last day of work was May 6, 1960. He had worked for this employer for 14 years and his final rate of pay was $2.20 per hour.

At the hearing claimant stated that he left his employment because he was dissatisfied with the system the employer used to keep his time and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Riehl v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Stillman v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. Davis Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. Mollo Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. Pierce Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hambridge Steel Erectors, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API