Legal Opinion
Washington v. Rodriguez
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided March 5, 1971No. 537PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SPIESS, Chief Judge.
Defendants Washington and Austin, by separate motions under Rule 93, [§ 21-1-1 (93), N.M.S.A. 1953 (Rpl.Vol. 4)] seek to vacate sentences which had been imposed upon them on April 14, 1961, following their conviction of the crime of sodomy under Chapter 78, Laws of 1955 (now repealed).
The motions were consolidated for hearing in the district court and are so presented here. Denial of the motions after hearing by the trial court resulted in this appeal. We affirm.
Separate briefs have been filed on behalf of each defendant and, as will be shown, certain of the points…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. MaestasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1957
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Santillanes v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- Carter v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
- Neville v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- State v. ElliottNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. CallawayCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.