Legal Opinion
Neville v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided June 3, 1981No. [No. 31, September Term, 1980.] [No. 33, September Term, 1980.]PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRodowsky, J.
Davidson, J., dissents and filed a dissenting opinion at page 386 infra.
These appeals in criminal cases which were consolidated for argument in this Court question the constitutionality, primarily on privacy and equal protection grounds, of the Maryland perverted practices statute. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the convictions.
*367I
Appellant Howard Chester Killy, Jr. (Kelly), then age 18, was tried before a jury in the Ci rcmi Court for Anne Arundel Comity. His prosecution was initiated on the complaint of a 16-year-old female, Pat. A fi-And of Kelly, Ronald Holden (Holden), was…
2Cases cited76 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Ingraham v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. LancasterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Koshko v. HainingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Schochet v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- Hargrove v. Board of TrusteesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- Lambeth v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.