Legal Opinion

State v. Elliott

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1976No. 10575PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

OMAN, Chief Justice.

A writ of certiorari was issued to the New Mexico Court of Appeals. We reverse the opinion of the Court of Appeals insofar as it held to be unconstitutional § 40A-9-6, N.M.S.A.1953 (2d Repl.Vol. 6, 1972), which was our sodomy statute in effect at the time in question but which has since been repealed and replaced by § 40A-9-21, N.M.S.A.1953 (Supp.1975). We remand the case to the Court of Appeals for further consideration and for disposition of the issues involved in the appeal to that court in light of our decision. The opinion of the Court of Appeals appears as…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Doe v. Commonwealth's Attorney for RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Doe v. Commonwealth's Atty. for City of RichmondDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1975
  4. State v. HelkerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. State v. ElliottNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. ElliottNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Griego v. OliverNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State v. SantosSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980
  4. Schochet v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  5. Hartford v. Gibbons & Reed Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API