Legal Opinion

Finkelman v. Clover Jewelers Boulevard, Inc.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1975No. 7717PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*147OPINION

2Per curiam

In the course of certain extensive and numerous pretrial proceedings respondent moved for and received an order for the production of certain documents. This was only one of many in-court maneuvers in which both parties participated equally. In this one instance, however, the copies of the documents produced were ruled illegible, unintelligible, unidentifiable and so badly reproduced as to be worthless for examination. On that the trial court ordered appellants’ answers stricken and default entered. Subsequently, the court also later refused to set aside the order entering default and…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Bon Air Hotel, Inc. v. Time, Inc., and Dan JenkinsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  3. John Halverson v. Campbell Soup Company, Defendant-Third-Party and Wolfes-Jensen Company, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
  4. Oaks v. RojcewiczAlaska Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. LewisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fire Insurance Exchange v. Zenith Radio Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Temora Trading Co., Ltd. v. PerryNevada Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. StiglitzNevada Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Kelly Broadcasting Co. v. Sovereign Broadcast, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API