Oaks v. Rojcewicz
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
RABINO WITZ, Justice.
The primary issue in this appeal is whether the trial court properly dismissed appellant’s third party claim. Cardinal to the resolution of this question is the proper construction of Civ.R. 37(b) (2) [c], which authorizes the imposition of sanctions when a party has refused to “make discovery.”
Civ.R. 37(b) (2) [c] provides:
Refusal to Make Discovery — Conse quences.
⅜ ⅜ * * * ⅝(b) Failure to Comply With Order.
⅜ * * * * ⅜(2) Other Consequences. If a party * * * refuses to obey an order * * * made under Rule 34 to produce any document or other thing for inspection, copying…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Tot v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Hovey v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Hammond Packing Co. v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State v. GuinnAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Continental Insurance Companies v. Bayless & Roberts, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Ketchikan Cold Storage Company v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
- Zakroff v. MayCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
- Waldrop v. WeaverWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.