State v. Stiglitz
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Gunderson, J.:
In the instant appeal, we reverse a district court order which dismissed an information because the State failed to produce an informant for interview.
Respondents Stiglitz and Arndt were charged with Conspiracy to Receive Stolen Property. See NRS 199.480. As the preliminary hearing transcript reveals, an informant introduced an undercover police officer to Stiglitz for the purpose of selling stolen T.V. sets. In truth, the sets had not been stolen, but merely loaned to the police in order to expose a fencing operation. Following sale of the sets to Arndt,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. Felipe CervantesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Jackson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1974
- United States v. Noel Quinn, United States of America v. Lee WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Kenneth Vincent Leon, United States of America v. Kimberley Harrison, United States of America v. Denise BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sheriff of Washoe County v. VasileNevada Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. TapiaNevada Supreme Court · 1992
- Twigg v. Sheriff, Elko CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1979