Legal Opinion

Blinder v. Division of Narcotic Enforcement

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 26, 1972No. Civ. 29434PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOLINARI, P. J.

This is an appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment entered following the granting of defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings.

Plaintiffs Martin Blinder, Joel Fort, Paul Freeman, Eugene Schoenfeld, and Fred Wilder are individuals duly licensed by the State of California as physicians who, in the course of their medical practice, are called upon to prescribe treatment for the disease of narcotic addiction. (These plaintiffs are hereinafter referred to as “physician plaintiffs.”)

Plaintiffs Mary Fitzsimmons, Albert McCoy, Anthony Sandoval and Charles Weaver are…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Marchetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Grosso v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Shea v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  2. 7978 CORPORATION v. PitchessCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. Aden v. YoungerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Wilson v. California Health Facilities CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. Board of Medical Quality Assurance v. AndrewsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API