Legal Opinion

Bates v. Johnston

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 29, 1943PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Applicant seeks our order to allow him, without payment of costs, to prosecute his appeal from judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, filing with his petition the affidavit required by 28 U.S. C.A. § 832. The application alleges that a similar application to the district court denied him the right so to proceed because his appeal lacked the merit required also by § 832.

The permission to appeal rests with the court in which was commenced the proceeding in which the appeal is sought. Cf. Steffler v. United States, 319 U.S. 38, 41, 63 S.Ct. 948, 87…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Steffler v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Stanley v. SwopeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
  3. Kelly v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Spruill v. Temple Baptist ChurchCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API