Legal Opinion

H. W. Stanfield Construction Corp. v. Robert McMullan & Son, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 28, 1971No. Civ. 10131PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

COUGHLIN, J.

Defendant, a painting subcontractor, appeals from a money judgment awarding damages to plaintiffs, general contractors, on account of defendant’s refusal to do painting work in compliance with a bid submitted to plaintiffs.

In preparation of a bid on the prime contract to do construction work for the United States Navy, plaintiffs advertised for bids from subcontractors on various phases of the work. On January 25, 1968, a few hours before the time for submission of bids on the prime contract, defendant, in a telephonic communication with plaintiffs, submitted a bid of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Drennan v. Star Paving Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Southern California Acoustics Co. v. C. V. Holder, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1969
  3. French v. Board of Education of Santa Monica Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Loranger Construction Corp. v. E. F. Hauserman Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1978
  2. Douglas E. Barnhart, Inc. v. CMC Fabricators, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. C. R. Fedrick, Inc. v. Borg-Warner CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  4. I & R Mechanical, Inc. v. Hazelton Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
  5. C. R. Fedrick, Inc. v. Borg-Warner CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API