Legal Opinion

Loranger Construction Corp. v. E. F. Hauserman Co.

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided March 23, 1978PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKeville, J.

The plaintiff-appellee (Loranger) is a general contractor. The defendant-appellant (Hauserman) manufactures movable metal partitions. On May 20, 1968, Loranger was preparing a bid for a contract to construct buildings for a community college. A sales engineer employed by Hauserman, knowing of Loranger’s plan to bid on the general contract, telephoned Loranger and quoted a figure of $15,900 for supplying and installing the metal partitions. The quotation was based upon plans and specifications of the buildings which the engineer felt were a sufficient basis for the quotation. Hauser-man’s was…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Frances M. Bonebrake, Administratrix De Bonis Non of the Estate of Woodrow B. Simek, Deceased v. Donald Cox and Claude Cox, D/B/A Tamarack BowlCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
  2. Hoffman v. Red Owl Stores, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Drennan v. Star Paving Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Cellucci v. Sun Oil Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1974
  5. McLearn v. HillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Carroll v. Xerox Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  2. Coll v. PB Diagnostic Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  3. Loranger Construction Corp. v. E. F. Hauserman Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  4. Rhode Island Hospital Trust National Bank v. VaradianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  5. Sullivan v. Chief Justice for Administration & Management of the Trial CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API