Doe v. Doe
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the Court
Plaintiff appeals the grant of summary judgment in favor of the State of Vermont on the basis of sovereign immunity. Because the trial court did not allow an adequate opportunity for plaintiff to conduct discovery, we reverse.
The following facts are not in dispute. On December 13, 1991, defendant B. Doe, * a former high ranking employee at the Vermont Department of Travel and Tourism, was convicted of lewd and lascivious conduct with a child, for sexually abusing plaintiff. The abuse began in the summer of 1989, when plaintiff was thirteen and continued until September 1991. On January 27,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Poplaski v. LamphereSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
- In Re Margaret Susan P.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1999
- Bushey v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
- Al Baraka Bancorp (Chicago), Inc. v. HilwehSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
3Cited by13 opinions
- LoPresti v. Rutland Regional Health Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2004
- Town of Victory v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
- Daroczi v. V T. Center for the DeafDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2004
- Carter v. LeeVermont Superior Court · 2012
- Davison v. Caleidoscope Communication Co.Vermont Superior Court · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.