Legal Opinion

The May Department Stores Company v. Monroe Williamson, Sisters of St. Mary v. Donald A. Lerch and United States Postal Service

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 7, 1977No. 76-1597 and 76-1713PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENSON, Circuit Judge.

These appeals challenge the immunity of the United States Postal Service (USPS) to garnishment procedures to effect judgments in state courts. In both cases the USPS filed a motion to quash summons to garnishee. On July 2, 1976, the district court1 sustained the motions of USPS, thereby holding that the USPS was immune to garnishment procedures to effect judgments in state courts. We reverse.

When Congress created the USPS, it gave the Postal Service the authority to sue and be sued in its official name. 39 U.S.C. § 401(1). The words “sue and be sued” in their normal…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Federal Housing Administration, Region No. 4 v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Keifer & Keifer v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Reconstruction Finance Corporation v. JG Menihan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Standard Oil Division, American Oil Co. v. StarksCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Franchise Tax Board v. United States Postal ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Michele Portmann, Doing Business as Grafica, an Individual v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  3. National Association of Letter Carriers, Afl-Cio v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
  4. S. Unique, Ltd. v. Gila River Pima-Maricopa Indian CommunityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  5. Wickwire Gavin, P.C. v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API