Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Scott v. Fisher Knitting Mach. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 22, 1906No. Nos. 163-166PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of New York. This cause comes here upon appeal from a decree dismissing bill charging infringement of claims 1, 3, 6, and 7 of complainants’ patent No. 561,559, granted to David C. Beilis June 9, 1896, for a knitting machine.

1Opinion of the Court

TOWNSEND, Circuit Judge.

The art discussed herein relates to knitted fabrics and the machines by which they are produced. The patent in suit covers a machine for producing a heavy knit material, capable of use in making winter undergarments. Its construction is fully explained in the opinion of the court below. -139 Fed. 137.

The claims in suit are as follows:

“(1) A knitting', machine having two sets of needles and cams therefor for producing ribbed fabrics, jacks or loopers, cams and a bed therefor, operated by the driving mechanism of said machine to interlace a supplemental thread with the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hutter v. De Q. Bottle Stopper Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1904
  2. Scott v. Fisher Knitting Mach. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1905

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hoeltke v. C. M. Kemp Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1936
  2. Reynolds v. Whitin MacH. WorksCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
  3. Remington Cash Register Co. v. National Cash Register Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1925
  4. Sun Ray Gas Corp. v. Bellows-Claude Neon Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
  5. United States Pipe & Foundry Co. v. James B. Clow & Sons, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API