Legal Opinion

City of Longmont v. Swearingen

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 4, 1927No. 11,552PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sheaeor

The defendants in error, hereinafter referred to as the plaintiffs, recovered a judgment for $3,500 against the plaintiff in error, hereinafter designated as the defendant, to review which defendant brings the case here. Plaintiffs’ recovery was for the death of their son Gene Leslie Swearingen, caused, they allege, by certain acts of negligence of defendant, the one relied upon here being that defendant failed to exercise reasonable care in connection with the maintenance and operation of a swimming pool, owned by defendant, in that defendant failed to provide a life guard or attendant to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Nichols v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  2. Pierce v. ConnersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894
  3. Brotherton v. Manhattan Beach Improvement Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Williams v. Sleepy Hollow Mining Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1906
  5. Catlett v. Colorado & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1914

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Colorado v. SharpSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  2. Hoggard v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1939
  3. Garhart Ex Rel. Tinsman v. Columbia/HealthOne, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  4. Hilzer v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
  5. Reigel v. SavaSeniorCare L.L.C.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2011

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API