Legal Opinion

Williams v. Sleepy Hollow Mining Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1906No. 5059; No. 2625 C. APublishedCited by 40 opinions

Error to the District Cou,rt of Gilpin County. Hon. A. H. De France, Judge. Action by Minnie Williams against The Sleepy Hollow Mining Company. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailey

Defendant was the owner of the Sleepy Hollow mine, situate in Gilpin county. The shaft was about 625 feet deep. .The Americus mine, with a shaft about 500 feet deep, joined the Sleepy Hollow on the west. The Mabee-Fisk mine, with a shaft more than 700 feet" deep, joined the Americus on the west.

The owners of the Americus ran a level, .known as the 390-foot level, eastward into the territory of the Sleepy Hollow. The Americus also ran a level, known as the 490-foot level, westward to within about .fifty feet of the Mabee-Fisk line and opposite the point on the Mabee-Fisk property where the ore…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Detroit & Milwaukee Railroad v. Van SteinburgMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Sullivan v. India Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  3. Union Pac. Ry. Co. v. JarviCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1892
  4. Dorsey v. Phillips & Colby Construction Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Greenleaf v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Phillips v. Denver City Tramway Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1912
  2. Arps v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  3. Swanson v. MartinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
  4. City of Longmont v. SwearingenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  5. Parker v. Manchester Hotel Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API