Legal Opinion

Edwards v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 25, 2001No. B151526PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ALDRICH, J.

In what appears to be a case of first impression in California, we are called upon to address the question whether the plaintiff, in serving the 90-day notice of intent to commence an action against a medical practitioner (Code Civ. Proc., § 364), 1 must allege the specific factual basis of each cause of action in the lawsuit to be filed. We hold: (1) the 90-day notice requirement of section 364 is not jurisdictional; (2) the total failure to comply with the statute does not invalidate an action against the medical practitioner; and (3) a failure to allege the specific…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Lewis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. CAMSI IV v. Hunter Technology Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. Foxborough v. Van AttaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. IIG Wireless, Inc. v. Yi, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. Howard v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. Faigin v. Signature Group Holdings, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. Huff v. WilkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. Brumley v. FDCC CALIFORNIA, INC.California Court of Appeal · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API