Edwards v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ALDRICH, J.
In what appears to be a case of first impression in California, we are called upon to address the question whether the plaintiff, in serving the 90-day notice of intent to commence an action against a medical practitioner (Code Civ. Proc., § 364), 1 must allege the specific factual basis of each cause of action in the lawsuit to be filed. We hold: (1) the 90-day notice requirement of section 364 is not jurisdictional; (2) the total failure to comply with the statute does not invalidate an action against the medical practitioner; and (3) a failure to allege the specific…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
- Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Lewis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- CAMSI IV v. Hunter Technology Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1991
- Foxborough v. Van AttaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- IIG Wireless, Inc. v. Yi, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Howard v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Faigin v. Signature Group Holdings, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Huff v. WilkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Brumley v. FDCC CALIFORNIA, INC.California Court of Appeal · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.