Bradley v. Sandilands
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the district court for St. Louis county, in favor of plaintiffs, entered in pursuance of the findings and order of John H. Norton, Esq., referee.
1Opinion of the CourtBuck, J.
The plaintiffs claim title to lot 9 in block 29 in the town of Oneota, now a part of the city of Duluth. This claim is made by them as heirs at law of Catherine Ely, who died April 15, 1881. The defendant claims title to the same property by virtue of a default judgment and an execution sale of the property thereunder. This judgment and execution sale is assailed by the plaintiffs as void, and hence a cloud upon their title. On the trial it was agreed by the parties that the title to the lot in question is in the plaintiffs, unless their ancestors were divested of the same by virtue of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Spencer v. HaugSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Cain v. RockwellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
- Knox v. RandallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1878
- Barrett v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
- McGaughey v. WoodsIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re Appeal of Meyer from Confirmation of Paving AssessmentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- West Duluth Land Co. v. BradleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899