Legal Opinion

In re Appeal of Meyer from Confirmation of Paving Assessment

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 21, 1924No. 23,839PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQuinn, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the district court of Dakota county, dismissing an appeal from an assessment made by the city council of the city of Hastings, for the paving of certain streets in that city. The proceeding was had and the paving done under the provisions of chapter 65, p. 62, Laws 1919, as amended by chapter 419, p. 648, Laws 1921.

On May 16, 1921, a petition was presented, to the city council of the city of Hastings,1 asking that certain portions of Second street and of Sibley street be paved. The petition contained the statement that the signers were owners of property abutting on…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Bridger v. Exchange BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  2. Board of Commissioners v. PlotnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Market National Bank v. Pacific National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  4. State ex rel. Cunningham v. District Court of Ramsey CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
  5. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Klapmeier v. Town of Center of Crow Wing CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. In Re Appeal of MeyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  3. Nemzek v. Clay CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API