Legal Opinion

West Duluth Land Co. v. Bradley

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 17, 1899No. Nos. 11,295—(192)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

From an order of the district court for St. Louis county, Moer, J., denying a motion for a new trial, defendants appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

This was an action to determine adverse claims to vacant and unoccupied lands. Defendants answered, asserting title in themselves, and a trial resulted in a conclusion of law directing judgment for plaintiff. This appeal is from an order denying defendants’ motion for a new trial.

1. The plaintiff’s title to the property depends upon the validity of the execution sale in controversy, and passed upon, in Bradley v. Sandilands, 66 Minn. 40, 68 N. W. 321. We there held the sale valid. The defendants’ claim of title here rests, as did the plain*276tiffs’ in that case, upon the contention that the sale…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bradley v. SandilandsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Anderson v. Stayton State BankOregon Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API