Bodkin v. Kerr
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Clay county to determine the adverse claims of defendant to real estate in possession of plaintiff. The case was tried before Baxter, J., who found in favor of plaintiff. From an ■order denying a motion for a new trial, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
Respondent brought this action to quiet title to real estate. Appellant answered, denying that respondent was the owner of the premises, ■or that she was in possession thereof, and alleged that respondent’s husband, W. J. Bodkin, was the real owner, and that the land had been ■conveyed to his wife for the purpose of defrauding his creditors. The *302answer further alleged that appellant claimed title as a purchaser at an-execution sale under a judgment recovered against Mr. Bodkin prior to-the transfer of title to respondent.
The cause came on for trial, and the parties, by common consent and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hossfeldt v. DillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
- Minneapolis Stock-Yards & Packing Co. v. HalonenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- De Lancey v. FinneganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Shea v. HynesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Riley v. MitchellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Libaire v. Minneapolis & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
- In Re Estate of EmpengerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935