Shea v. Hynes
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Dakota county, Williston, J., denying a motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
Action to set aside a transfer of certain real property alleged to have been made to hinder, delay, and defraud creditors. The action was dismissed at the trial in the court below, and plaintiff appealed from an order denying a new trial.
The facts are as follows: On September 8, 1896, one Michael Hynes was the owner of certain real property situated in the county of Dakota, which he on that day conveyed to .defendant, his son, for the expressed consideration of $2,000. About two weeks thereafter he died. His estate was probated, and found to be insufficient to pay his debts. Subsequently…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hubbard v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
- Gottlieb v. ThatcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- King v. RussellTexas Supreme Court · 1874
- Minneapolis Stock-Yards & Packing Co. v. HalonenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Darling v. RickerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1896
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ritchie Capital Management v. John StoebnerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- Thompson v. SchiekSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- First National Bank v. MensingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1920
- Gustafson v. GustafsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- Quinn v. Minneapolis Threshing Machine Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.