Legal Opinion
Gardner v. Division of Employment Security
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided June 26, 2012No. ED 97740PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, Presiding Judge.
Claimant Brittani Gardner appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial *?Relations Commission determining that she was ineligible to receive unemployment benefits because she was not unemployed. Claimant contends that the Commission erred in its application of the law as it relates to claimants working part-time while seeking full-time employment. We reverse and remand.
Background
Claimant began receiving unemployment benefits after she was discharged from her position with State Farm Insurance in February 2011. After two unsuccessful months…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hampton v. Big Boy Steel ErectionSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
- HUBBELL MECHANICAL SUPPLY CO. v. LindleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
- Bryant v. Labor & Industrial Relations CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- DeLong's, Inc. v. PurcellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mary Reed v. Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- Brunk v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- Della Scheumbauer, Claimant/Appellant v. City of St. Louis, Employer/Respondent, and Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021
- Lucia-Carma Greer v. Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- ROBYN PRICE v. MIDWEST HEALTH CONSULTING, INC. and DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITYMissouri Court of Appeals · 2022