Legal Opinion
Buti v. Impressa Perosa, S.R.L.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 9, 1996No. 95 Civ. 3525 (AGS)PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
SCHWARTZ, District Judge:
Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Peck’s Report and Recommendation urging that the Court grant plaintiffs Tommaso Buti and Fashion World Company (collectively “Buti”) — owners of the “Fashion Cafe” in Rockefeller Center in Manhattan — summary judgment on their action seeking a declaratory judgment that defendant Impressa Perosa, S.R.L. (“Impressa”) — owner of a “Fashion Cafe” in Milan, Italy — does not have rights in the trademark “Fashion Cafe” for restaurant services and clothing in the United States. Magistrate Judge Peck also recommends that…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Strawbridge v. CurtissSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Rafic Saadeh v. Fawaz FaroukiCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Tommaso Buti Fashion World Company, Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants-Appellees v. Impressa Perosa, S.R.L., Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Douglas v. Victor Capital GroupDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- New World Solutions, Inc. v. NameMedia Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- McAllister v. New York City Police DepartmentDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.