Legal Opinion
Tommaso Buti Fashion World Company, Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants-Appellees v. Impressa Perosa, S.R.L., Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided February 24, 1998No. 97, Docket 96-9630PublishedCited by 83 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COTE, District Judge:
Defendant Impressa Perosa, S.R.L. (“Impressa”) appeals from an August 9,1996 Memorandum Decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Schwartz, J.) granting summary judgment to plaintiffs Tommaso Buti and Fashion World Company (referred to collectively as “Buti”) on their claim for a declaratory judgment that Impressa has no rights under federal trademark law in the name “Fashion Cafe” for restaurant services and clothing in the United States. The District Court also granted summary judgment to Buti on Impressa’s counterclaims,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United Drug Co. v. Theodore Rectanus Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- United States v. SteffensSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Vanity Fair Mills, Inc. v. The T. Eaton Co. Limited and John David EatonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- Covington v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- The Morningside Group Limited v. Morningside Capital Group, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- ITC Ltd. v. Punchgini, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Douglas v. Victor Capital GroupDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Courtenay Communications Corporation v. Patricia Hall and Hallmark Capital Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.