Fortier v. Parry
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Hennepin county to determine adverse claims to a vacant city lot. The case was tried before Leary, J., who made findings that defendant was the owner of the land subject to the lien of plaintiff for $7.97 and ordered that the land be sold to satisfy the lien. From an order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial and for the amendment of the findings of fact and conclusions of law, he appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
Action to determine adverse claims to a city lot. Defendant is the owner, unless his title has been divested by a tax proceeding under which plaintiff claims. And the only matter urged against the tax title is, the notice of the expiration of the right of redemption, is illegal, in that it failed to state accurately the amount required to redeem and also in that the numbering of the notice issued by the auditor is not correct.
Pursuant to a real estate tax judgment entered April 23, 1910, to enforce taxes delinquent for the year 1908, the lot was on May 13, 1910, bid in for the state, and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sperry v. GoodwinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Midland Co. v. EbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- McNamara v. FinkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Shine v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Slocum v. McLarenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
3Cited by3 opinions
- Telford v. McGillisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Johnson v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Leach v. Woodhill Realty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923