Legal Opinion

Telford v. McGillis

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 16, 1915No. Nos. 19,362, 19,363—(236, 237)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Action in the district court for St. Louis county to determine adverse claims to an undivided interest in certain vacant and unoccupied land. Charles McGillis intervened and filed a complaint in intervention.

Read the full summary

Action in the district court for St. Louis county to determine adverse claims to an undivided interest in certain vacant and unoccupied land. Charles McGillis intervened and filed a complaint in intervention. The case was tried before Fesler, J., who made amended finding’s and ordered judgment that plaintiff was the owner in fee of an undivided of the land described and that defendant" Amelia Stubler was the owner in fee of an undivided -¿¶ and defendant Jacob Stubler was the owner in fee of an undivided From an order denying his motion for judgment notwithstanding the findings or for a new…

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C. J.

Action to determine adverse claims to certain real property situted in St. Louis county. The land is owned by several persons in undivided interests, and the case in this court resolves itself into two separate controversies, namely, (1) between plaintiff, and the defendants Stubler and the intervener, who join in contesting the validity of plaintiff’s title to a part of the land; and (2) between defendants Stubler and intervener, as to a’ part of the land not owned by plaintiff. Plaintiff claimed to own an undivided nine-twelfths of the land, but the court awarded to him title to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Rowell v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Merrill v. DearingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  3. Parsons v. UrieCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1906
  4. Schroeder v. LahrmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
  5. Lawton v. BarkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Baker v. LeavittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Eder v. FinkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  3. Neill v. HakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  4. Ferch v. HillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  5. Daniel v. HillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API