Legal Opinion

State v. Lockridge

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 30, 2016No. C101161CR; A154986PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHadlock, C. J.

Defendant appeals a judgment revoking probation. He assigns error to the trial court’s admission of hearsay evidence at his probation revocation hearing, arguing that hearsay was not admissible against him in a probation revocation hearing absent the state demonstrating good cause for not producing the declarant. According to defendant, the admission of that evidence violated his due process right to confront witnesses under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Because we agree with the state that defendant did not preserve in the trial court the argument that he now…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Hagler v. Coastal Farm Holdings, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2013
  4. State v. WidemanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  5. Ggv v. JlrWyoming Supreme Court · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  2. State v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  3. State v. HersheyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API