Legal Opinion

Morin v. Clark

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 27, 1937PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.

The bill in substance alleges that the defendant Clark has replevied from Morin eighty pattern plates for the manufacture of the “pouring sheets” which are used by publishers in casting stereotype plates; that these pattern plates are the property of Morin; that they have peculiar *481value in addition to the value of the labor and materials employed in forming them as indicating the sizes and shapes of the casting boxes used by the various publishers who buy the pouring sheets made from the patterns; that Clark now intends to make pouring sheets for said publishers and that he replevied the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Stevens v. Rockport Granite Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  2. Pearson v. MulloneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  3. Goddard v. BinneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  4. MacLeod v. DavisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  5. Cook v. ScheffreenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Jet Spray Cooler, Inc. v. CramptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  2. Minot v. MinotMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. English Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  4. Michelson v. AronsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1976
  5. Watkins v. Simplex Time Recorder Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API