Legal Opinion
Breen v. Mineta
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 16, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2005-0654PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, United States District Judge
The above-captioned case involves claims brought by former flight service specialists against the Federal Aviation Administration and the Department of Transportation alleging violations of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621, et seep The Court has more fully described the factual and procedural history of this case in an earlier opinion. See Breen v. Chao, No. 05-0654, 253 F.Supp.3d 244, 2017 WL 2312884 (D.D.C. May 26, 2017). This matter now comes before the Court upon the ten motions for…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Fariss v. Lynchburg FoundryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- Atkins Ex Rel. Atkins v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Sinito Ex Rel. Sinito v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- Wardell Giles v. Gary CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Asklar v. Honeywell, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Robertson v. CartinhourDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
- Stonehill v. National Archives and Records AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024