Legal Opinion

Kirschman v. Pitt Publishing Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 29, 1935No. Appeal, 120PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Maxey,

The appellant, who was the plaintiff below, filed suit against the appellee in an action in trespass for malicious prosecution and false arrest. He claimed that the defendant, Pitt Publishing Company, falsely charged that he.“armed with a revolver did unlawfully on a public highway attack and rob affiant [an employee of defendant] of valuable papers of the value of $10.” Upon this charge he was arrested, restrained of his liberty, and required to furnish bond for hearing, later being discharged by the jfistice of the peace. After trial the jury returned a verdict…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Markley v. SnowSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  2. Westminster Water Co. v. Mayor of WestminsterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1904
  3. Farneth v. Commercial Credit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  4. Edwards & Strong v. Power Gasoline Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Bowman v. Press Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Conley v. MervisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. DiBona v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. Seligson v. YoungSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  4. Pascone v. Thomas Jefferson UniversitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Brown v. Metz, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Mercer County1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API