Legal Opinion
United States Ex Rel. Accardi v. Shaughnessy
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 15, 1954No. 366PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
347 U.S. 260 (1954)
UNITED STATES EX REL. ACCARDI
v.
SHAUGHNESSY, DISTRICT DIRECTOR OF THE IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE.
No. 366.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued February 2, 1954.
Decided March 15, 1954.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.
Jack Wasserman argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.
Marvin E. Frankel argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Acting Solicitor General Stern, Assistant Attorney General Olney, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. Maysack.
2Opinion of the Court · ClarkJustice Clark
This is a habeas corpus action in which the petitioner attacks…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Accardi v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Bridges v. WixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States Ex Rel. Bilokumsky v. TodSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Nishimura Ekiu v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Salinger v. LoiselSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by2 opinions
- Luis Sanchez v. Jefferson SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- C.J.L.G., a Juvenile Male v. Jefferson SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018