Legal Opinion

C.J.L.G., a Juvenile Male v. Jefferson Sessions

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 29, 2018No. 16-73801PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Concurrence by Judge Owens

OPINION

CALLAHAN, Circuit Judge:

“The right to counsel in immigration proceedings is rooted in the Due Process Clause [of the Fifth Amendment] and codified at 8 U.S.C. § 1362 and 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(b)(4)(A) [of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”), 8 U.S.C. §§ 1101, et seq.].”1 Biwot v. Gonzales, 403 F.3d 1094, 1098 (9th Cir. 2005). Sections 1362 and 1229a(b) (4) (A) set forth the scope and contours of this- right, providing that the alien “shall have the privilege of being represented (at no expense to the Government) by such counsel ... as [the alien] shall…

2Cases cited68 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  3. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Baltazar Hernandez Barron Margarita Hernandez Ramirez v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. C.J.L.G., a Juvenile Male v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  2. Beltran Prado v. NielsenDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2019
  3. J. F.M. v. Matthew WhitakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  4. Elder Gutierrez-Bulux v. Jefferson SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  5. Oscar Huelgas v. Jefferson SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API