State v. Spivey
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
Appellant presents a number of issues for our consideration. (See Appendix, infra.) We have considered appellant’s propositions of law and have reviewed the death sentence for appropriateness and proportionality. Upon review, and for the reasons that follow, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals and uphold the sentence of death.
I
We have held, in cases too numerous to cite, that this court is not required to address and discuss, in opinion form, each and every proposition of law raised by the parties in a death penalty appeal. We continue to adhere to that position today. Here,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- State v. XieOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. BerryOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. JellsOhio Supreme Court · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- State v. MadrigalOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. TreeshOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. LaMarOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. LaMarOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. TibbettsOhio Supreme Court · 2001
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.