Legal Opinion
Noble v. White
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 28, 2004No. AC 22887PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McLACHLAN, J.
In this breach of contract action to collect attorney’s fees for services rendered in connection with creditors’ claims, the defendants, Carl E. White and Kathryn White, appeal from the judgment of the trial court awarding the plaintiff, Christopher C. *235Noble, their former attorney, $10,665.25 in damages.1 The defendants claim that the court lacked jurisdiction to award attorney’s fees because under the circumstances of this case, the power to award such fees rested solely with the Bankruptcy Court. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
This action commenced in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Miller v. EganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- In Re WhitmanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1985
- Mechanics Savings Bank v. TuckerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Gladstone, Schwartz, Baroff & Blum v. HovhannissianConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Noble v. WhiteConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Alter and Associates, LLC v. LantzConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Grey v. Connecticut Indemnity Services, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Assn. v. EssaghofConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022