Legal Opinion
United States v. Payton-O'brien and Ravenscraft
Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals
Decided June 28, 2017No. 201700133PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JONES, Judge:
J.M. petitions this court for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of mandamus. She seeks relief from a lower court ruling ordering the production and disclosure of her privileged mental health records based on the now-excised, constitutional exception to the psychotherapist-patient privilege, Military Rule of Evidence (Mil. R. Evid.) 513, Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2016 ed.). On 21 April 2017, we granted a stay, and now find the petitioner has met her burden to demonstrate that extraordinary relief is warranted. The writ is granted.
We hold that a military…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Cheney v. United States District Court for District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re C. PU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2019
- In Re AjwNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2021
- Tinsley v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
- United States v. BeaugeNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2021
- United States v. JacintoNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.