Griffith v. Griffith
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the Court
Dr. Griffith, a physician, chose to conduct his own defense to a complaint for modification brought by his former wife. Such a complaint had been invited by the findings and orders of the Probate Court judge made in connection with the divorce. At that time, Dr. Griffith was not employed, and, in consequence, the judge limited the imposition of monetary obligations upon Dr. Griffith to $100 per week for child support. The judge’s order provided that “either party may apply to this Court to make a further *944order of alimony or child support commensurate with his then earnings.” The trial of the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Commissioner v. LesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- International Fidelity Insurance v. WilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Commonwealth v. ColemanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Furtado v. FurtadoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- King v. GraceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Freedman v. FreedmanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
- Buckley v. BuckleyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
- Johanson v. AldridgeMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1999
- Porter v. Metrowest Automotive Resources, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2000
- Richman v. RichmanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.