Legal Opinion

Porter v. Metrowest Automotive Resources, Inc.

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided May 5, 2000PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

This is an action to recover for the defendant’s G.L.c. 93A unfair and deceptive practices, fraud and deceit in connection with its sale to the plaintiff of a used car with substantial defects and a false odometer reading. After a lengthy trial, judgment was entered for the plaintiff in the amount of treble damages totaling $21,597.00, plus interest, costs and $10,000.00 in attorney’s fees.

The sole contention presented by the defendant on this Dist./Mun. Cts. R. A. D. A., Rule 8C, appeal is that it was denied its constitutional right to a fair and impartial trial because of the trial judge’s…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Linkage Corp. v. Trustees of Boston UniversityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  2. Haddad v. GonzalezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  3. McGrath v. MisharaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  4. Commonwealth v. FitzgeraldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  5. In the Matter of SaabMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wendt v. WendtConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  2. Davis v. DouglasMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2008
  3. Reznik v. YeltonMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2011
  4. Magnaghi v. Pickett's Service CenterMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2002
  5. Tufts University Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine v. SaffranMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API