Legal Opinion

Florida Bar v. Fortunato

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided March 22, 2001No. SC96979PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

We have for review a referee’s report recommending that attorney Melody Ridg-ley Fortunato be publicly reprimanded for violating several of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 15, Fla. Const.

I. FACTS

The Bar filed a complaint against Fortu-nato and, after a hearing, the referee recommended finding her guilty of several charged rule violations for failing to respond to two related appellate court orders, which failure resulted in not only the dismissal of her chent’s appeal but also in the issuance of a third appellate court order sanctioning Fortunato, to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. CibulaSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
  2. The Florida Bar v. SegalSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  3. The Florida Bar v. WeisserSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
  4. The Florida Bar v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  5. Florida Bar v. ArangoSupreme Court of Florida · 1998

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. BatistaSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
  2. Florida Bar v. HeadSupreme Court of Florida · 2012
  3. The Florida Bar v. Rita Horwitz AltmanSupreme Court of Florida · 2020
  4. The Florida Bar v. Rita Horwitz AltmanSupreme Court of Florida · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API