Legal Opinion

Memphis Union Station Co. v. City of Memphis

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1930PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cook

The bill was filed to recover taxes alleged to have been illegally exacted by the city. Complainant’s right to recover is dependent upon whether the power given the city to collect the tax under chapter 408, Private Acts of 1915, was withdrawn by subsequent legislative enactment.

Chapter 408 of the Private Acts of 1915 is an amendment to the charter of the City of Memphis. Section 1 imposed a privilege tax for use of the city upon each of 148 enumerated occupations, among* them railroad terminal companies, taxed at $750 annually. Section -2 authorized the city to assess other taxable…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smiddy v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1918
  2. State ex rel. Clyde v. Mayor of BristolTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Camden Fire Ins. Ass'n. v. HastonTennessee Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Lawrence v. MacFarlandTennessee Supreme Court · 1962
  5. City of Memphis v. Foreign Insurance CompaniesTennessee Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Fleur De Lis Motor Inns, Inc. v. BairSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  2. City of Goodlettsville v. Priceline.com, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2012
  3. (PC) Bowcutt v. DaramDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  4. (PC) Bradford v. ChurchDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
  5. (PC) Burke v. DitomasDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API