Legal Opinion
(PC) Bowcutt v. Daram
District Court, E.D. California
Decided February 19, 2025No. 2:21-cv-00736Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DONALD RAY BOWCUT, No. 2:21-cv-00736 SCR P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 VASUKI DARAM, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. Presently before the court is defendants’ motion for summary judgment. (ECF 19 No. 47.) For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned recommends that defendants’ motion 20 be granted. The undersigned further orders the Clerk of the Court to correct…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.