Legal Opinion

Budget Marketing, Inc., and Charles A. Eagle, Appellants/cross-Appellees v. Centronics Corporation, Appellee/cross-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 17, 1991No. 89-3043, 90-1040PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge.

Budget Marketing, Inc. (BMI) and Charles A. Eagle appeal from an order of summary judgment denying their claims against Centronics Corporation for: (1) breach of implied duty to negotiate in good faith; (2) promissory estoppel; and (3) negligent misrepresentation. This suit arises out of the breakdown in negotiations for the purchase of BMI by Centronics. The district court also entered summary judgment against Centronics on its counterclaim of negligent misrepresentation. Both parties appeal. We affirm in part, but reverse on BMI’s and Eagle’s claim of…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. R.G. Group, Inc., and R.G. Restaurant Associates v. The Horn & Hardart Company, and Bojangles' of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  2. Teachers Insurance & Annuity Ass'n of America v. Tribune Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
  3. Arcadian Phosphates, Inc., Judas Azuelos, and Eli Sivan v. Arcadian CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  4. Hoffman v. Red Owl Stores, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,667 Reprosystem, B v. and N. Norman Muller, and Cross-Appellants v. Scm Corporation, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Rebecca A. Berg v. Norand CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  2. Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. Dain Bosworth Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  3. 168th and Dodge, LP v. Rave Reviews Cinemas, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  4. Johnson International, Inc. v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  5. Keystone Land & Development Company, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Xerox Corporation, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API