United States v. One Buick Roadster Automobile
District Court, E.D. Oklahoma
At Law. Proceeding by the United States for the forfeiture of one Buick roadster automobile. On demurrer to portions of the interplea of E. C. King.
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, District Judge.
The question arises on the demurrer, of the plaintiffs to certain portions of the ínterplea of E. C. King, wherein he asserts an interest in or lien upon the automobile in controversy, by virtue of a mortgage executed to him by C. C. Latía, the owner of the car. ’From the informal ion it appears that on the 20th of *962March, 1917, certain officers of the United States for the suppression of the liquor traffic among the Indians seized the car, which was foiind by them in the possession and under the control of one C..C. Katta, who, it is alleged, was then using the car…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- The PalmyraSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Dobbins's Distillery v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- United States v. Brig Malek AdhelSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
- Joplin Mercantile Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- United States v. One AutomobileDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Van Oster v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- State v. PetersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
- Ford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1919
- Minehart v. LittlefieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Rock Island Implement Co. v. FagerquistSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.