Legal Opinion

Mazzo v. Board of Pensions & Retirement of Philadelphia

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 17, 1992No. 69 E.D. Appeal Docket 1991PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FLAHERTY, Justice.

This is an appeal, by allowance, from an order of the Commonwealth Court which reversed an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia which had reversed an order of the Board of Pensions and Retirement of the City of Philadelphia denying pension benefits to the appellants, Albert Mazzo *80and John Anderson. On the basis that appellants are entitled to receive their pension benefits, we reverse.

Appellants were employed as police officers in the City of Philadelphia when, on March 8, 1984, they were dismissed from their jobs. The dismissals occurred…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Western Pennsylvania Restaurant Ass'n v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Council of Middletown Township v. BenhamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Commonwealth ex rel. Zimmerman v. Officers & Employees Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Bilec v. Auburn & Associates, Inc. Pension TrustSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Fisher EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. AbrahamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Holt's Cigar Co. v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Fross v. County of AlleghenySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Public Employee Retirement Administration Commission v. BettencourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
  5. Bellis v. Board of Pensions & RetirementCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API